-
Click on images to enlarge.
All images scanned at 100% 150dpi.
Search
Type in the name of the band, journalist, photographer, year etc. to see all pertaining content. It's ugly but it works.Recent Comments
- j d morley on The Stone Roses live at The I.C.A. May 27th 1989
- Jon on Notice
- MUSIC REVIEW | Oasis – (What’s the Story) Morning Glory (1995) | Bored and Dangerous on David Stubbs reviews What’s the Story (Morning Glory), 30th September 1995
- Everett True | excerpted from an interview with Damon Albarn of Blur, March 1996 | COLLAPSE BOARD on Everett True interviews Blur in America, 9th March 1996
Categories
- Advertisements (57)
- Covers (59)
- Features (42)
- Interviews (87)
- Live Reviews (52)
- Melody Maker (266)
- Mr. Agreeable (17)
- Music Reviews (50)
- N.M.E. (39)
- Uncategorized (14)
Archives
- September 2013 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- January 2011 (1)
- June 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (7)
- February 2010 (15)
- January 2010 (11)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (7)
- June 2009 (19)
- May 2009 (19)
- April 2009 (10)
- March 2009 (22)
- February 2009 (26)
- January 2009 (11)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (21)
- October 2008 (24)
- September 2008 (20)
- August 2008 (19)
- July 2008 (27)
- June 2008 (30)
- May 2008 (20)
-
Recent Posts
Journalists
Photographers
Related mp3 blogs
Related Sites
- Alan McGee
- Creation Records Fan Site
- Fierce Panda (Simon Williams)
- Freaky Trigger
- Martin Carr
- Melody Maker Journalists
- Plan B Magazine (Everett True)
- Rocklist: Melody Maker albums/singles EOY lists 1970’s – 2000
- Scans from Record Mirror and ZigZag
- Smash Hits archive (1979-1980+)
- Spin Magazine Archive (85-present)
- Sweeping the Nation
- The Legend! (Everett True)
- The Quietus
- The Rock Magazine Archive
- Velvet Coalmine
- When Saturday Comes
- Wikipedia list of N.M.E. covers
Stats
February 28, 2010 at 3:46 pm
The harsh criticism in this review seams rather surprising if you bear in mind that they voted this record as their “Album Of The Year” only half a year later. They then described it as “a deep, lush, brooding music that served to frame Smith’s vocal vulnerability with tarnished perfection.”. Of course there’s always a difference to be made between the opinion of a single writer and that of the whole editorial staff. But in my view the discrepancy shouldn’t be as big as in this case.
November 26, 2010 at 6:17 pm
Thanks for this, and a big thank you for this excellant website. Its only flaw is the lack of 70s and 80s stuff. When i think of all those NME and Sounds i threw in the dustbin!!
Still a great site though. cheers
regards
Daz